Do u agree or disagree with Boethius view on free will Essay

Do u agree or disagree with Boethius gull on free will - Essay ExampleMost certainly, free will is practical, and the independence of cream by people to embrace virtue is a factor reliant on the exercise of free select of the will. The choice to do the unethical is also subject to the free will and decision of an individual. any humanity is rational, and the choice to do evil does not come from God. If humans were to follow the will of God, there would be no evil. Therefore, the presence of evil in the society emanates from the authority of humans to observe the free choice of the will. The free choice of the will of individuals may be compromised because of the desires that humans possess. The passion possessed by individuals explains their how their desires drive them to commit evil despite Gods wish for humanity to prevail. Even so, there is no connection of God with the evil and either source of evil is from free choice of the will that individuals posses. God bears no respo nsibility for the actions of humans. The relationship that humans have, with God, take aims the need to practice virtue. God does not require humans to compromise the free choice of will to have intolerable conducts in the society. The determination of causation in humans has unlimited provisions, and understanding is of al-Qaida of establishing what is better than the other is. This entails a succinct understanding of the ability of humans to launch detailed and comprehensive inquiry in a concern or problem. The voluntary decisions of the mind render the determination of the problem causation an unlimited endeavor. The notion of prerequisite and causation of phenomena or a problem has virtually no end and any inquiry would turn to end at supposition (Cahn 869). The only way to determine problem causation is to bring the diverse causes to compress positions and assume that the unit used is representative enough to believe in the cause. Determination of causation refers to the no tion that every action of humans is unavoidable. Free choice of will has an effect on the determination of causation. Every event has a cause, the basis of which its necessity originates. Human actions emanate from the causes, and their fulfillment is out of free choice of the will. The causes of the various actions of humans are the necessitating factors that motivate the observance of the free choice of will. In response to the question of necessity and liberty of the mind, there is a lucid relationship between necessity and the free choice of the will. Necessity refers to the factor that adjoins the cause and the effects of a choice. Since the mind possesses the freedom of choice, liberty is a construct of necessity. It is on liberty of mind that the proof of free choice finds its basis. It entails the capacity to pursue the diverse actions we have according to the forces dictated by the will. That is, if one chooses to allege an issue, he or she enjoys the freedom. Similarly, if the same person chooses to reverse the decision, they would enjoy the same level of freedom to do so as they would to perform the contrary (Cahn 869). That would tenderize a ten tentative means of determining free will. Since liberty of the mind and necessity have relationships, and God has a dictation on necessity, and so God has control over the liberty of the mind. If necessity was to demand evil, liberty of mind that acts on the necessity would lead to choice of the evil. The relationship between necessity and liberty of mind may be a reason for immoral conducts of humans. Ethics and religion, in any society, show